Reduction genioplasty in facial harmonization: case report

Main Article Content

Leonel Fernando Malaver Caicedo
Juan Pablo Mejía Barbosa
Katherin Andrea Borda Pedraza
Luiz Felipe Maranhao Tavares Cardozo
Manuela Díaz Valenzuela

Abstract

Introduction: Sliding Genioplasty is an important tool in the aesthetic surgery of the lower third of the face, it allows the harmonization by moving the osteotomized segment in different planes. Objective: to describe the pre-surgical analysis for a Genioplasty in a patient with skeletal anomaly and macrogenia in the vertical and horizontal dimensions. Results: the analysis concludes a chin reduction in two planes, an infrequent procedure in the surgical management of the lower third. Discussion: although most of the corrections made today involve an advance or descent of the chin in cases of retro or microgenia, it is important to recognize other deformities and evaluate facial proportions, dental occlusion, cephalometric measurements and photographic images identifying the specific needs of each patient. Conclusion: performing a correct identification of the skeletal class and an aesthetic facial analysis allows identifying the type of deformity and planning its surgical management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Malaver Caicedo LF, Mejía Barbosa JP, Borda Pedraza KA, Tavares Cardozo LFM, Díaz Valenzuela M. Reduction genioplasty in facial harmonization: case report. Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello [Internet]. 2023Oct.24 [cited 2024May18];51(3):232 - 238. Available from: https://www.revista.acorl.org.co/index.php/acorl/article/view/704
Section
Reportes de Casos

References

Bertossi D, Galzignato PF, Albanese M, Botti C, Botti G, Nocini PF. Chin Microgenia: A Clinical Comparative Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(5):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0518-4

Kumar BL, Raju GK, Kumar ND, Reddy GV, Naik BR, Achary CR. Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometric study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(4):44-50.

Niechajev I. Reduction genioplasty for mandibular prognathism and long chin. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(3):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00853-8

Bueller H. Ideal Facial Relationships and Goals. Facial Plast Surg. 2018;34(5):458-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669401

Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(7):839-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.01.012

Ho CT, Huang CS, Lo LJ. Improvement of chin profile after mandibular setback and reduction genioplasty for correction of prognathism and long chin. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(5):1198-206. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9933-y

Ward JL, Garri JI, Wolfe SA. The osseous genioplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34(3):485-500. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.009

Guyuron B, Michelow BJ, Willis L. Practical classification of chin deformities. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00451101

Arroyo HH, Olivetti IP, Lima LF, Jurado JR. Clinical evaluation for chin augmentation: literature review and algorithm proposal. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(5):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j. bjorl.2015.09.009

Zide BM, Warren SM, Spector JA. Chin surgery IV: the large chin--key parameters for successful chin reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(2):530-37. doi: 10.1097/01. prs.0000267636.25672.81

Sykes JM, Suárez GA. Chin Advancement, Augmentation, and Reduction as Adjuncts to Rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(1):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.021

Lee EI. Aesthetic alteration of the chin. Semin Plast Surg. 2013;27(3):155-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357113

Hohl TH, Epker BN. Macrogenia: a study of treatment results, with surgical recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;41(5):545-67. doi: 10.1016/0030- 4220(76)90307-